FEDERATION CYNOLOGIQUE INTERNATIONALE (AISBL)
SECRETARIAT GENERAL: 13, Place Albert 1
er
B – 6530 Thuin (Belgique)
___________________________________________________
___________________________
07.02.2017/ EN
FCI-Standard N° 38
WELSH CORGI (CARDIGAN)
©
M.Davidson, illustr. NKU Picture Library
St-FCI N° 38/ 07.02.2017
2
ORIGIN
: Great Britain.
DATE OF PUBLICATION OF THE OFFICIAL VALID
STANDARD
: 30.10.2016.
UTILIZATION
: Herding & companion.
FCI CLASSIFICATION
: Group 1 Sheepdogs and Cattle
Dogs (except Swiss Cattle
Dogs).
Section 1 Sheepdogs.
Without working trial.
GENERAL APPEARANCE
: Sturdy, tough, mobile, capable of
endurance. Long in proportion to height, terminatin
g in fox-like brush,
set in line with body.
IMPORTANT PROPORTION
: Length of foreface in proportion to
head 3 to 5.
BEHAVIOUR / TEMPERAMENT
: Alert, active and intelligent.
Steady, not shy nor aggressive.
HEAD
: Foxy in shape and appearance.
CRANIAL REGION:
Skull: Wide and flat between ears; tapering towards
eyes above
which it is slightly domed.
Stop: Moderate.
FACIAL REGION:
Nose: Black, projects slightly and in no sense blun
t.
Muzzle: Tapering moderately towards nose.
Jaws / Teeth: Teeth strong with scissor bite, i.e.
upper teeth closely
overlapping the lower teeth and set square to the j
aws. Underjaw
clean cut. Strong but without prominence.
St-FCI N° 38/ 07.02.2017
3
Eyes: Medium size, clear, giving kindly, alert but
watchful
expression. Rather widely set with corners clearly
defined.
Preferably dark, or to blend with coat, rims dark.
One or both eyes
pale blue, blue or blue flecked permissible only in
blue merles.
Ears: Erect, proportionately rather large to size o
f dog. Tips slightly
rounded, moderately wide at base and set about 8 cm
(3.5 ins.) apart.
Carried so that tips are slightly wide of straight
line drawn from tip
of nose through centre of eyes, and set well back s
o that they can be
laid flat along neck.
NECK
: Muscular, well developed, in proportion to dog’s
build,
fitting into well sloping shoulders.
BODY
: Fairly long and strong.
Topline: Level.
Loin: Waist clearly defined.
Chest: Moderately broad with prominent breast bone.
Brisket deep.
Well sprung ribs.
TAIL
: Like a fox’s brush set in line with the body and
moderately
long (to touch or nearly touch ground). Carried low
when standing
but may be lifted a little above body when moving,
not curled over
back.
LIMBS
: Strong bone. Legs short but body well clear of th
e ground.
FOREQUARTERS:
Shoulder: Well laid, angulated at approximately 90
degrees to upper
arm, muscular.
Elbow: Close to sides.
Forearm: Slightly bowed to mould round the chest.
Forefeet: Round, tight, rather large and well padde
d. Turned slightly
outwards.
HINDQUARTERS:
General appearance: Strong, well angulated and alig
ned with
muscular thighs and lower thighs; strong bone carri
ed down to feet.
Legs short.
St-FCI N° 38/ 07.02.2017
4
Metatarsus (Rear pasterns): Vertical when standing,
viewed from
side and rear.
Hind feet: Round, tight, rather large and well padd
ed.
GAIT/ MOVEMENT
:
Free and active, elbows fitting close to sides,
neither loose nor tied. Forelegs reaching well forw
ard without too
much lift, in unison with thrusting action of hindl
egs.
COAT
Hair: Short or medium, of hard texture. Weather-pro
of, with good
undercoat. Preferably straight.
Colour:
Accepted colours are blue merle, brindle, red, sabl
e,
tricolour with bridle points and tri colour with re
d points.
All of the above with or without typical white mark
ings on head,
neck chest, underparts, legs and feet, white tail t
ip. White should
nod predominate on body or head where it should nev
er
surround the eyes. Nose and eye rims must be black
. Liver and
dilute colours highly undesirable.
SIZE AND WEIGHT
:
Ideal height at withers: 30 cm.
Weight: In proportion to size with overall balance
the prime
consideration.
FAULTS
: Any departure from the foregoing points should b
e
considered a fault and the seriousness with which t
he fault should be
regarded should be in exact proportion to its degre
e and its effect
upon the health and welfare of the dog
and on its ability to perform
its traditional work.
FEDERATION CYNOLOGIQUE INTERNATIONALE (AISBL)
SECRETARIAT GENERAL: 13, Place Albert 1
er
B – 6530 Thuin (Belgique)
___________________________________________________
___________________________
07.02.2017/ EN
FCI-Standard N° 38
WELSH CORGI (CARDIGAN)
©
M.Davidson, illustr. NKU Picture Library
St-FCI N° 38/ 07.02.2017
2
ORIGIN
: Great Britain.
DATE OF PUBLICATION OF THE OFFICIAL VALID
STANDARD
: 30.10.2016.
UTILIZATION
: Herding & companion.
FCI CLASSIFICATION
: Group 1 Sheepdogs and Cattle
Dogs (except Swiss Cattle
Dogs).
Section 1 Sheepdogs.
Without working trial.
GENERAL APPEARANCE
: Sturdy, tough, mobile, capable of
endurance. Long in proportion to height, terminatin
g in fox-like brush,
set in line with body.
IMPORTANT PROPORTION
: Length of foreface in proportion to
head 3 to 5.
BEHAVIOUR / TEMPERAMENT
: Alert, active and intelligent.
Steady, not shy nor aggressive.
HEAD
: Foxy in shape and appearance.
CRANIAL REGION:
Skull: Wide and flat between ears; tapering towards
eyes above
which it is slightly domed.
Stop: Moderate.
FACIAL REGION:
Nose: Black, projects slightly and in no sense blun
t.
Muzzle: Tapering moderately towards nose.
Jaws / Teeth: Teeth strong with scissor bite, i.e.
upper teeth closely
overlapping the lower teeth and set square to the j
aws. Underjaw
clean cut. Strong but without prominence.
St-FCI N° 38/ 07.02.2017
3
Eyes: Medium size, clear, giving kindly, alert but
watchful
expression. Rather widely set with corners clearly
defined.
Preferably dark, or to blend with coat, rims dark.
One or both eyes
pale blue, blue or blue flecked permissible only in
blue merles.
Ears: Erect, proportionately rather large to size o
f dog. Tips slightly
rounded, moderately wide at base and set about 8 cm
(3.5 ins.) apart.
Carried so that tips are slightly wide of straight
line drawn from tip
of nose through centre of eyes, and set well back s
o that they can be
laid flat along neck.
NECK
: Muscular, well developed, in proportion to dog’s
build,
fitting into well sloping shoulders.
BODY
: Fairly long and strong.
Topline: Level.
Loin: Waist clearly defined.
Chest: Moderately broad with prominent breast bone.
Brisket deep.
Well sprung ribs.
TAIL
: Like a fox’s brush set in line with the body and
moderately
long (to touch or nearly touch ground). Carried low
when standing
but may be lifted a little above body when moving,
not curled over
back.
LIMBS
: Strong bone. Legs short but body well clear of th
e ground.
FOREQUARTERS:
Shoulder: Well laid, angulated at approximately 90
degrees to upper
arm, muscular.
Elbow: Close to sides.
Forearm: Slightly bowed to mould round the chest.
Forefeet: Round, tight, rather large and well padde
d. Turned slightly
outwards.
HINDQUARTERS:
General appearance: Strong, well angulated and alig
ned with
muscular thighs and lower thighs; strong bone carri
ed down to feet.
Legs short.
St-FCI N° 38/ 07.02.2017
4
Metatarsus (Rear pasterns): Vertical when standing,
viewed from
side and rear.
Hind feet: Round, tight, rather large and well padd
ed.
GAIT/ MOVEMENT
:
Free and active, elbows fitting close to sides,
neither loose nor tied. Forelegs reaching well forw
ard without too
much lift, in unison with thrusting action of hindl
egs.
COAT
Hair: Short or medium, of hard texture. Weather-pro
of, with good
undercoat. Preferably straight.
Colour:
Accepted colours are blue merle, brindle, red, sabl
e,
tricolour with bridle points and tri colour with re
d points.
All of the above with or without typical white mark
ings on head,
neck chest, underparts, legs and feet, white tail t
ip. White should
nod predominate on body or head where it should nev
er
surround the eyes. Nose and eye rims must be black
. Liver and
dilute colours highly undesirable.
SIZE AND WEIGHT
:
Ideal height at withers: 30 cm.
Weight: In proportion to size with overall balance
the prime
consideration.
FAULTS
: Any departure from the foregoing points should b
e
considered a fault and the seriousness with which t
he fault should be
regarded should be in exact proportion to its degre
e and its effect
upon the health and welfare of the dog
and on its ability to perform
its traditional work.
So sad.
There is no question in my mind that the dogs were lost to heat stroke. There was no AC and windows and doors were closed. When I checked temp the day the dogs died, the high was 31 and not 27. The van was grossly over crowded and there is no possibility that two roof vent fans could circulate air to most of the dogs and definitely could not cool the van as they only bring in air the temperature of the environment. Heat stroke absolutely causes blood from mouth. A dog I cared about lost his life along with the others. It was a tragedy that this happened. The van was suitable for transport but not for housing dogs.
I concur with the comments above and I’m disappointed you would publish this article based solely on the handler’s fabrication of the events. A vent system equivalent to the one in your bathroom is not adequate to cool a van packed with 12 dogs. Just because Mr Manni doesn’t want to accept it, it does not change the fact those dogs suffered heat stroke. Anyone who has cooked a steak knows blood and other juices are secreted as meat cooks which was exactly what was happening to those poor dogs. And if you are suffocating for air you are going to try and escape, not drink water. This was not a tragic accident. This was negligence and totally avoidable. I hope Mr Manni will man up to this fact.
It still shocks me how often people make the most horrendous mistakes about dogs. They are NOT human beings. Dogs do NOT cool themselves as we do and it is often their sad undoing. I feel so awful for the dogs (especially the whippet :(( )and hope they didn’t suffer as much as my imagination is telling me.
If it was 27°C that is 80° That is pretty damn hot if you think about it. In one hour the temperature inside that van would of went up to close to 120° I just feel so sorry for all the dogs we had to perish. As a professional handler they should’ve known better Shame on you.
This is 100% horrendous poor judgement and gross human error. Temp varies per account, but certainly common sense should tell you, these were very unsafe conditions for any living creature.
Mr. Manni is not an expert and could not make a judgement in regards to whether the dogs were poisoned or died from heat stroke. His comment is purely an attempt to draw the attention away from the fact that the dogs died while in his care. Even if it did turn out to be poison they would have been exposed while in his care.
Necropsies will tell the truth and it is my understanding that the first one is completed and found death was due to heat stroke.
BISD…I do hope you will be following up this interview with the facts when they are made available to you.